Indelacio.co.uk

With todays technology it is completely impossible. People are going about trying to have something that will instantly destroy something at one point and recreate it perfectly at another point without any damage to the being, and have all of the moving parts moving exactly as they were before being sent. Lets list the reasons why that cannot happen

Firstly it would not be possible to perfectly map and destroy something to be recreated exactly the same because the time it takes to map something so complex as the inner workings of a body cells and micro organisms would have moved thus making it impossible to have mapped. The only way around this would be to speed up the being to the point where all the molecules are transformed into light, and have this light sent to the destination and slowed down again. Of course that would not work for the other reasons teleportation would not be possible.

Think of how your computer picks up a wireless signal, if there is another signal transmitted at the same time it would interrupt the signal and corrupt the teleportation so the reciever would stand a good chance of losing the person before they arrived. Light and electronic waves are easily distorted by objects in the way, shifts in the atmosphere etc could easily corrupt a signal too leading to someones insides being in the wrong place and even outside. Also sometimes even conditions can be perfect like your computer gets but only half of the web page you are trying to get loads up for no reason only reloading it would fix the problem but with someone being sent as a beam of light there is no reload button, its you get them or they die.

A way around those problems would be to speed them into light place them in a capsule fire that at the destination have them remove the capsule and slow down the being but I still think things could easily go wrong there especially as the being would be stationary light in the capsule and possible change or start to reintergrate as there is no motion propelling them forward enough to remain as light molecules.

Also in this day and age we lack anything powerful enough to speed up a living creature to the point where thier molecules would become light thus ruling out the possibility the energy required and the space requirements of such a device would be enormous unless some sort of gravity well manipulation where involved spinning the space around the being to such a speed that they would be in a contained cyclonic event speeding up their molecules to the speed of light.

Reality is we should find another fast way of moving around our planet such as faster personal transportation vehicles which can fly, underground high speed magnetized trains between all continents, or some new feasible transportation method.

Okay, one of my many theories, which I will add to here at some point in the future. Right on the theory of “dark matter” so nobody knows exactly how much there is, but its stated that its required for the universe to have formed and that roughly at the moment 90% of the universe is missing.

Okay secondly black holes have been proven to exist, theyre not exactly massless now are they. they suck in matter at such a rate that not even light can escape… So that means that they have some weight, and these havent been included in these scientific constructs of the universe being created. Black holes amongst other things are formed from the destruction of some remote stars which burn themselves out in a supernova, could also make other spacial anomolies, but for this discussion Im just going to mention black holes.

So burnt out stars make black holes, which we cant see or account for all of with out microscopes unless they are doing something to make themselves visible like sucking in a remote sun. They account for some of the missing mass, and of course all the stuff theyve been sucking in all these years could easily account for the rest of the missing mass. I do have a theory on the destruction of the universe and will mention this in this section later. You do have to think to yourself, if 90% of the universe is indeed missing, then how much longer has the universe got left until the black holes suck in the rest of the mass? If we know how long the universe has existed of course then we would be able to work out a rough estimate but hey, only 10% of the universe remains unexploded or unsucked into black holes so not much left now.

You do have to allow for some mass so small floating in the space between solar systems, microscopic spacedust so small that our telescopes cant detect it; this could account for some extra mass, and detecting this could be the key to seeing black holes as seeing the lack of the microscopic dust (and the fluctuations like a tornado causes) would show exactly where a black hole is and its path and speed.